One of my readers tells me of a psychologist friend of his who has developed a way of shaking awake couples whose marriages are mired in arguing.
The first half hour is devoted to the litany of complaints from both the wife and her husband.
At that point, the psychologist asks the wife to leave the room while she (presumably) thinks he’s going to read the riot act to her husband.
Then he tells the husband “Buddy, you & your wife can come here once a week for a long time and do this and make my car payment for me or you can walk out of here today and never see me again if you answer this question correctly. Do you want to be right or do you want to be happy?”
It could just as easily work the other way around – the advice delivered to the wife and this is not to say that real issues should be avoided.
When arguing becomes a sport in which both spouses look to rack up points, the marriage is not going to be happy.
Choose your poison.
Be right or be happy.

Not so fast, Jerry.
Any good rating system is based on negotiated criteria. For example, a restaurant is rated on food, service, atmosphere, etc. These are the “expectations” you have about a restaurant when you rate it. Both you and the owner would agree.
The same can’t be said of relationships – where most “expectations” are NOT negotiated.
As a result of these non-negotiated expectations – such as “you should know what I want” or “it’s common sense to do that” – people judge (rate) each other unfairly all the time. At home and at work.
So, Jerry, when your spouse rates you, I hope the criteria list is negotiated and agreed on. We write about how to understand this behavior in our blog at http://www.btmgmt.net.
John Parikhal